Cardinal Benoit wants to have a “last chance” after 15 years in prison

Prior to 2011, a murderer could apply for judicial review after serving 15 years in prison if he felt he had been rehabilitated. He is a High Court judge, then an arbitrator and finally after a lengthy process of obtaining the approval of the Parole Board of Canada, he may in some cases be released prematurely. He was charged with first-degree murder for 25 years.

However, this provision of the Criminal Code was amended by the Conservatives 10 years ago and only applies to murderers who committed their crime before December 2, 2011.

Cardinal Benoit, who beat and killed the mother of his six children on January 16, 2020, will not be able to benefit from it and will have to spend 25 years in prison before qualifying for parole. He will be 68 years old.

Completely unequal effects

Amendment made by paragraph 745.6 (1) (a1) of the Criminal Code, Is widespread and has completely unequal effects, Benoit believes in his petition for incapacity, unconstitutionality or invalidation filed Wednesday in Cardinal Joliet Court.

Grab a killer Blurred optimism Violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, according to its lawyers, by infringing on the rights to life, liberty and security, causing cruel and extraordinary punishment.

Philip Comtois writes that there is no rational connection with public safety to abolish the blurred rule of faith. Just because an offender can apply for parole after 15 years does not mean he will get it. Only those with the lowest risk of recurrence will succeed, and they will again Under the yoke Until the lifetime of the Parole Board of Canada.

Remember that the imposition of a sentence should not lead to a desire for revenge, but rather in an exercise aimed at finding a reasonable and relevant sentence., Underlines the security of the Benoit Cardinal.

Come around Political agenda

The debate could go to the Supreme Court, which believes the Bar and Lawyers Association in Quebec Prison Law. Its vice president welcomes the fact that the courts have seized this claim In this way we get out of the political aspect, M Sylvie confirms portalis.

The Blurred optimistic arrangement Repealed by the Conservative government of Stephen Harper, which sought to toughen punishments for more serious crimes.

There are people who understand, feel, and change, and it doesn’t take 25 years to do so. Those who do not stay in prison. Life sentence is life sentence, Says M Portelis, who believes the financial costs of keeping a person behind bars are high More than 10 years.

The guilty verdict was appealed by Cardinal Benoit Presented on May 8th.

Another killer who failed

A similar petition by another killer was rejected this spring in Montreal.

Jeremy Fordier-Grenier, convicted of first-degree murder and corpse contempt for his father, challenged the constitution of Section 745a) of the Criminal Code, which imposes a life sentence without the possibility of parole. Before the age of 25.

As a result of constitutional violations, he said, since the repeal Blurred optimistic arrangement. Quebec’s Attorney General won the case against it.

Jeremy Fordier-Grenier’s defense did not directly attack the abolition of the review mechanism, but rather the general provision on the death penalty.

In his April 26 judgment, High Court Judge Claude Champagne held that the killer’s protection under Section 745a) violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Liberties. Freedom and security. His decision has been appealed.