It was written in the sky.
Now that the QS has replaced the hoodie with a tie, changed its awareness of the revolution for the “real world” and social democracy, in short, the QS now resembles the PQ, how are we going to differentiate the two parties?
Why should voters vote for a pro-independence social-democratic party when there is already a pro-social-democratic party at the polls?
Simple: Let’s say PQ is anti-immigration and QS is pro-immigration.
The QS will try to stand out by branding the feminine image of the immigrant tall and portraying the evil PQ as a party of closure and integration.
While the PLQ paid tribute to Philippe Couillard (what a funny idea), the GND decided to participate (inter alia) in the celebration of the least popular prime minister in Quebec’s history by using the former doctor’s words of worship. Lines) The PQ, upholding its identity, “spits out volcanoes of intolerance”.
PQ, closeted left-wing separatists.
We, the left-wing separatists, are opening up.
It was written in big red letters against the blue sky.
Open the floodgates
Even if we repeat in every tone that establishing immigration limits is not only legal but necessary given our capacity to receive them, that does not fit the minds of those who are united.
A time when they had no humanity.
Banish the idealists and they come back in a flash. You can take the hoodie out of the party, but you can’t take the party out of the hoodie.
Or should I say keffiyeh?
Once a utopian, always a utopian.
For the left, the only word that can be said when it comes to immigration is “more.”
To paraphrase Tanton: “Immigrants, more immigrants, more immigrants!”
And accommodations? Health? Education? Social projects?
Well, it works automatically.
If GND doesn’t say, like the inexplicable Mark Miller, immigrants will come with their hammers and sickles and build their own houses.
Anyone with a modicum of common sense understands that a social safety net woven for X number of people is in danger of tearing itself apart if the floodgates are opened too wide.
But at QS, we still haven’t gotten the memo.
Or we got it, but we trashed it because what you want, if you want to overtake your opponent on the left, you have to demonize him.
Turn on the lights
“We cannot allow Paul St-Pierre Plamonton to turn this beautiful and excellent plan for the independence of Quebec into a referendum against immigration,” the GND launched.
Yes, does the PSPP want a referendum against immigration?
And what would be the question? “Should Quebec become a country made up of staunchly Catholic whites?”
Poor people in solidarity.
They want a radical right in Quebec that will help them.
Unfortunately, there isn’t one.
So if we can’t fight the fire, we start the fire.
I think that’s what “being practical” means in QS.
