Rwanda: A hostel housing genocide survivors prepares to welcome people deported by the United Kingdom

Rwanda: A hostel housing genocide survivors prepares to welcome people deported by the United Kingdom
The Rwandan government told CNN that immigrants will receive full residency, health care and support for five years or until they are self-sufficient. it’s a controversial scheme The United Kingdom described it as innovative approach to safe and legal recourse that would disrupt the dangerous business of people smugglers. But he has been condemned by dozens of refugee rights groups, international agencies, British leaders, the head of the Anglican Church, and even Rwandan opposition politicians.

A week before the first arrival was due to arrive, workers were putting the finishing touches on a small wooden shed next to the inn’s restaurant. “This will be a store so they can buy what they need here instead of going out of the house,” explained Ismael Pekina, managing director of the company. Two covered areas in the gardens will serve as smoking areas and the remote tent will double as an interview room and games area.

There is an airport-style security check before the front desk, including a baggage scanner and guards with metal detectors. They are polite, professional and thorough. “You see, we are ready for immigrants, even today,” Pacina says, speaking to CNN just hours before the first round of legal challenges against deportation kicked off in the UK last week. Legal cases against the policy have so far been unsuccessful, and the first flight from the UK to Rwanda is set to take off on Tuesday.

When they arrive, two immigrants will share each room, with shared bathrooms and laundry areas on each floor. They will also have two red carpeted prayer areas overlooking the hills of Kigali, free Wi-Fi and computers to follow their legal cases. The Rwandan authorities point out the relative privilege that immigrants will have here, compared to the ruling in British detention facilities.

See also  Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party loses majority in Indian election shock, needs allies for government | Indian elections 2024 news

“We want them to have safe and dignified accommodation, and there’s also a package they’re going to have so that they can acquire the skills to get any education, and possibly start a business,” Rwandan government spokeswoman Yolande Makulu told CNN.

The United Kingdom says it will pay Rwanda 120 million pounds ($145 million) over the next five years to fund the programme. Furthermore, the UK has also promised to pay processing and integration costs for each person transferred, covering the cost of legal advice, caseworkers, translators, accommodation, food and healthcare. According to a parliamentary research brief, the British government said it expects these costs to be similar to those of asylum processing in the UK, which are around £12,000 per person.

The UK has refused to disclose the cost of the flights it will charter to transport the deportees to Rwanda. In its latest annual report, the Home Office said it paid £8.6m to charter 47 deportation flights carrying 883 people in 2020. While the cost of individual flights varies by destination, the numbers mean that, on average, the Home Office spent £183,000 per flight or £9,700 per person.

Since there is no cap on the number of migrants, it is likely that thousands will flock to Kigali during the first five years of the plan.

supposed The safety offered by Rwanda has been questioned by international human rights organizations such as Human Rights Watch (Human Rights Watch), which says the country “cannot be considered a safe third country to send asylum seekers.”

Human Rights Watch has monitored and investigated the human rights situation in Rwanda for decades, documenting violations that ranged from “repression of freedom of expression to arbitrary detention, ill-treatment, and torture by the Rwandan authorities.”

The organization accused the Rwandan authorities of At least 12 refugees were killed and more than 60 arrested in 2018 After the police opened fire on a group of demonstrators protesting the reduction of food rations. The Rwandan National Commission for Human Rights investigated the incident and confirmed that the police “had to resort to force after all the peaceful men failed” but described the tragedy as an isolated event.

The UK plan has also drawn criticism from the only opposition party that ran against Rwandan President Paul Kagame in the last election, the Green Democratic Party of Rwanda, which says the country cannot afford it. “Rwanda is the most densely populated country in Africa. Do you think it would be easy for Rwanda to help these people?” Jean-Claude Ntizimana, CNN General Secretary.

See also  Hong Kong: Actor Gregory Wong among 12 people jailed over 2019 protests

Rwanda is roughly one-tenth the size of the United Kingdom, but is home to nearly 13 million people, roughly one-fifth of the UK’s population.

First British flight sends asylum seekers to Rwanda to move forward after appeal fails

The Green Party accuses the UK of violating its international obligations to ship unwanted migrants 4,000 miles to Rwanda. “When the choice of refugees is not inhumane and illegal,” Ntizimana said.

The Rwandan government insists that it is completely legal.

“There are no laws to be broken with this partnership,” McCullough told CNN. “Nothing in the Refugee Convention prevents asylum seekers from moving to another safe country.”

McCullough admits that a similar program with Israel did not work and that Rwanda abandoned it “very quickly”. But she says the UK migrant deal is very different and it will work. In fact, she said, Rwanda may soon accept immigrants from Denmark as well, with negotiations nearing the end of it.

Recently, Rwanda partnered with the United Nations refugee agency to take in vulnerable asylum seekers who were evacuated from Libya. Just over 1,000 migrants passed through the emergency transit center in Gachora in the three years the program was active. According to the director of the center, migrants stay between four and eight months on average before being resettled abroad. Migrants have three options: resettlement elsewhere, voluntary return to their homeland, or local integration into Rwandan society. Neither of the latter, according to Faris Royombo, chose the camp manager.

Zimen Fasaha, 26, has been in Qeshoura refugee camp for nearly a year.

“You cannot compare them (Libya and Rwanda),” said Zimen Fasaha, 26, an Eritrean refugee at the Ghashoura transit centre. He spent four years in what he described as horrific conditions in Libya, where he repeatedly tried, but in vain, to cross the Mediterranean to reach Europe. “It’s like going from hell to heaven.”

See also  Trump's legal troubles are getting worse without the protection of the presidency

Although the 11 months he spent in Rwanda in the camp were safer and easier, he was determined to leave.

And time is not alone in this. None of the refugees in the emergency center that CNN spoke to wanted to stay in Rwanda.

Nyalada Gatluak Gani, 26, from South Sudan, dreams of moving to Finland with her one and a half year old son. “What I want is not here, it is there,” she said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *