The United Nations Committee calls on the International Court of Justice to urgently study the Israeli ‘annexation’

The United Nations Committee calls on the International Court of Justice to urgently study the Israeli ‘annexation’

UNITED NATIONS – A United Nations panel on Friday approved a resolution demanding the International Court of Justice to intervene “urgently” in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Israeli “annexation”.

The Fourth Committee of the UN General Assembly voted in favor of the measure by a margin of 98 in favour, 17 against, and 52 abstentions.

The resolution, titled “Israeli Settlement Practices and Activities Affecting the Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs in the Occupied Territories,” was one of several that focused on the conflict during the session.

It asks the International Court of Justice, based in The Hague, to “urgently issue an advisory opinion” on “Israel’s long-standing occupation, settlement and annexation of Palestinian territories.”

It also calls for an investigation into Israeli measures “aimed at changing the demographic structure, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem” and says that Israel has adopted “discriminatory legislation and procedures.”

The solution Invites the Court to intervene in the dispute in accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations. The court, an organ of the United Nations, is separate from the International Criminal Court, which is also in The Hague.

The resolution will now be presented to the plenary session of the General Assembly for formal adoption, likely next month.

The last time the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion on the dispute was in 2004.

Countries that voted against the resolution included Israel, Australia, Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic, Italy, Germany, several Pacific Island nations and the United States.

Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine and the United Arab Emirates voted in favor of the resolution.

See also  Joe Biden to meet King Charles and Rishi Sunak on a visit to the UK

Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Gilad Erdan, criticized the measure at the committee’s session, describing it as part of a “long series of anti-Israel resolutions.”

“The only goal is to demonize Israel and absolve the Palestinians of responsibility,” Erdan said, adding that the decision “eliminates any hope of a solution.”

Erdan said the decision gives the Palestinians “the perfect excuse to continue boycotting the negotiating table,” noting the Palestinians’ rejection of past peace offers.

He also criticized the decision for referring to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem only by its Arabic name, Haram al-Sharif.

The Temple Mount is the holiest site for Jews as the site of ancient temples, and the third holiest site in Islam as the site of the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

United Nations representatives vote on a resolution calling for the opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on November 11, 2022. (Screenshot, used pursuant to Section 27A of the Copyright Act)

The resolution also refers to the Temple Mount as part of the “occupied Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem.”

“Freedom of worship is a value they refuse to uphold,” Erdan said, accusing the United Nations of spreading destructive lies that will only perpetuate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

In response to the resolution, the Palestinian delegation to the United Nations said, “Our people deserve freedom. Our people have the right to freedom.”

See also  Russia accused of exporting US military technology - DW - 10/20/2022

The US representative on the panel, Richard Mills, expressed “serious concerns” about the decision, saying it would “add to the mistrust” surrounding the dispute.

“There are no shortcuts to a two-state solution,” he said, adding that the phrase “Temple Mount” was “aimed at discrediting Israel.”

Israeli policy said directly

I joined The Times of Israel after many years of covering US and Israeli politics for Israeli news outlets.

I believe responsible coverage of Israeli politicians means offering a 360-degree view of their words and actions – conveying not only what is happening, but also what it means in the broader context of Israeli society and the region.

It’s hard to do because you can rarely take politicians at face value – you have to make an extra effort to provide the full context and try to overcome your own biases.

I am proud of our work that tells the story of Israeli politics straight and comprehensive. I think Israel is stronger and more democratic when professional journalists do their hard work well.

Your support for our work by joining The Times of Israel community Help ensure that we continue to do so.

Thank you,
Tal Schneider, political reporter

Join our community

Join our community

Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this

You are a professional reader

That’s why we started The Times of Israel ten years ago – to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world.

See also  Lula pledges to partner with China to balance global geopolitics

So far we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we have not put in place a paywall. But because the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining Times of Israel Society.

For as little as $6 a month, you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel Free adsas well as access EXCLUSIVE CONTENT Available only to members of the Times of Israel community.

Thank you,
David Horowitz, founding editor of The Times of Israel

Join our community

Join our community

Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *